Home/Practice Questions/Immigration Law

Immigration Law Practice Exam Questions

Practice exam questions covering visa categories, deportation, asylum, citizenship, and immigration enforcement.

2 Essay Questions
3 Multiple Choice Questions

Essay Questions

Practice these issue-spotting hypotheticals under timed conditions. Write your analysis first, then compare to the model answer outline.

Essay Question 1

25 minutes
A foreign national from Country X entered the United States on a tourist visa (B-2) and remained beyond the authorized period. Three years later, she applied for asylum, claiming she faces persecution in Country X based on her political opinions. She was an outspoken critic of the government before leaving Country X and had received death threats. The government argues her claim is barred by the one-year filing deadline for asylum applications under INA Section 208(a)(2)(B). Analyze the asylum claim and any exceptions to the one-year bar.
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
  1. 1.Asylum elements: The applicant must show she is a 'refugee' -- a person who is unable or unwilling to return to her country due to persecution or a well-founded fear of persecution based on race, religion, nationality, political opinion, or membership in a particular social group.
  2. 2.One-year filing deadline: INA Section 208(a)(2)(B) requires asylum applications to be filed within one year of arrival. The applicant filed three years late, which presumptively bars the claim.
  3. 3.Exceptions to the one-year bar: (1) Changed circumstances materially affecting eligibility (e.g., new evidence of persecution, changed country conditions), (2) Extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay (e.g., serious illness, ineffective counsel, maintaining lawful status).
  4. 4.Withholding of removal (INA Section 241(b)(3)) and Convention Against Torture (CAT) claims are not subject to the one-year bar and remain available as alternative forms of relief.

Essay Question 2

20 minutes
A U.S. citizen filed an I-130 petition for her husband, a citizen of Country Y who entered the U.S. without inspection. The couple married in good faith and have two U.S.-citizen children. The husband has no criminal history. Analyze the husband's path to lawful permanent resident status, including any bars and potential waivers.
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
  1. 1.Immediate relative petition: A U.S. citizen may petition for a spouse as an immediate relative (no visa number wait). However, the husband entered without inspection, which complicates adjustment of status.
  2. 2.Adjustment of status under INA Section 245(a) generally requires lawful admission. Entry without inspection disqualifies the applicant from adjustment under this section.
  3. 3.INA Section 245(i): If an immigrant petition or labor certification was filed on the husband's behalf before April 30, 2001, he may be eligible for adjustment by paying a penalty. Otherwise, this avenue is closed.
  4. 4.Consular processing alternative: The husband would need to depart and apply for an immigrant visa at a U.S. consulate. However, departure triggers the 3/10-year unlawful presence bars under INA Section 212(a)(9)(B).
  5. 5.I-601A provisional waiver: The husband may apply for a provisional unlawful presence waiver before departing, demonstrating extreme hardship to his U.S. citizen spouse. If approved, he can attend the consular interview with the waiver already in hand.

MBE-Style Multiple Choice Questions

Select the best answer for each question. Click "Reveal Answer" to see the correct answer and explanation.

Question 1

An asylum applicant demonstrates a well-founded fear of persecution based on political opinion. The government shows that the applicant committed a serious nonpolitical crime in her home country. The immigration judge should:

A.Grant asylum because the fear of persecution is established.
B.Deny asylum because commission of a serious nonpolitical crime is a mandatory bar.
C.Grant asylum but impose conditions on the applicant's status.
D.Refer the case to the criminal justice system before deciding.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: B

Under INA Section 208(b)(2)(A)(iii), an applicant is barred from asylum if there are serious reasons to believe the applicant committed a serious nonpolitical crime outside the United States. This is a mandatory bar. However, the applicant may still be eligible for withholding of removal or CAT protection if she meets those standards.

Question 2

A lawful permanent resident has lived in the U.S. for 6 years and been a permanent resident for 4 years. He is married to a U.S. citizen. He applies for naturalization. His application should be:

A.Approved because he meets the 5-year residency requirement.
B.Approved because he is married to a U.S. citizen and meets the 3-year residency requirement.
C.Denied because he has not been a permanent resident for 5 years.
D.Denied because he must wait until he has been a permanent resident for 5 years.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: B

Under INA Section 319(a), a permanent resident married to a U.S. citizen needs only 3 years of permanent residence (rather than 5) to be eligible for naturalization, provided the applicant has been living in marital union with the citizen spouse and the spouse has been a citizen for at least 3 years. With 4 years of permanent residence and marriage to a citizen, the applicant qualifies.

Question 3

An employer filed an H-1B petition for a foreign worker with a bachelor's degree in computer science for a software engineering position. The prevailing wage for the position is $85,000. The employer offered $70,000. The petition will most likely be:

A.Approved because the wage exceeds the federal minimum wage.
B.Denied because the employer must pay at least the prevailing wage.
C.Approved if the worker agrees to the lower wage.
D.Approved if the employer files a Labor Condition Application.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: B

H-1B employers must pay the higher of the prevailing wage or the actual wage paid to similarly employed workers. The Labor Condition Application (LCA) requires the employer to attest to paying the prevailing wage. Offering $70,000 when the prevailing wage is $85,000 violates this requirement, and the petition will be denied.

Generate Custom Immigration Law Exam Questions

Need more practice? Our AI exam generator creates unlimited, tailored practice questions for immigration law and other subjects.

More Practice Question Subjects