Civil Procedure Case Briefs

Civil procedure governs the mechanics of how civil lawsuits are initiated, conducted, and resolved in federal and state courts. As a 1L course, civ pro teaches students to navigate the rules that determine where a case can be heard, who has standing to sue, what must be pleaded, and how judgments are enforced. The subject is heavily tested on the bar exam and is foundational to every area of litigation practice.

The cases below cover the full civ pro curriculum. International Shoe Co. v. Washington and World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson define the minimum-contacts framework for personal jurisdiction. Erie Railroad v. Tompkins and its progeny — Guaranty Trust, Hanna v. Plumer, Shady Grove v. Allstate — establish the choice-of-law rules in diversity cases. On pleading, you will find the pivotal shift from Conley v. Gibson to the plausibility standard of Bell Atlantic v. Twombly and Ashcroft v. Iqbal. Class action doctrine is represented by Wal-Mart v. Dukes and Hansberry v. Lee.

Each brief is structured in standard law-school format — procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, and reasoning — so you can prepare for class, build your outline, or study for the final. Combine these briefs with our AI study tools to master jurisdiction, venue, joinder, discovery, summary judgment, and claim preclusion.

Amchem Products v. Windsor
Ashcroft v. Iqbal
Atlantic Marine v. District Court
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
Blonder-Tongue v. University of Illinois Foundation
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court
Burger King v. Rudzewicz
Burlington Northern v. Woods
Byrd v. Blue Ridge Rural Electric Cooperative
Capron v. Van Noorden
Caterpillar Inc. v. Williams
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett
Conley v. Gibson
Cromwell v. County of Sac
Daimler AG v. Bauman
Devlin v. Scardelletti
Empire Healthchoice v. McVeigh
Erie Railroad v. Tompkins
Ex parte McCardle
Exxon Mobil v. Allapattah
Federated Department Stores v. Moitie
Ferens v. John Deere Co.
Frier v. City of Vandalia
Gasperini v. Center for Humanities
Gonzalez v. Thaler
Goodyear v. Brown
Grable & Sons v. Darue
Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Hanna v. Plumer
Hansberry v. Lee
Hanson v. Denckla
Hertz Corp. v. Friend
Holmes Group v. Vornado
International Shoe Co. v. Washington
Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing
Louisville & Nashville R.R. v. Mottley
Mathews v. Eldridge
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank
Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
Osborn v. Bank of U.S.
Parklane Hosiery v. Shore
Patterson v. McLean Credit Union
Pennoyer v. Neff
Peralta v. Heights Medical Center
Phillips v. Shutts
Piper Aircraft v. Reyno
Rush v. City of Maple Heights
Semtek Int'l v. Lockheed Martin
Shady Grove v. Allstate
Shutts v. Phillips Petroleum
Sinochem Int'l v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping
Stewart Organization v. Ricoh Corp.
Swift v. Tyson
Taylor v. Illinois
Taylor v. Sturgell
Van Dusen v. Barrack
Wal-Mart Stores v. Dukes
Walker v. Armco Steel
Well Works Co. v. Layne
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. Woodson
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg

Need a brief for a different case?

Generate a comprehensive, law-school-formatted brief for any civil procedure case in under 30 seconds with our AI-powered tool.