Corporate Law Practice Exam Questions
Practice exam questions covering fiduciary duties, shareholder rights, mergers, corporate governance, and business judgment rule.
Essay Questions
Practice these issue-spotting hypotheticals under timed conditions. Write your analysis first, then compare to the model answer outline.
Essay Question 1
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
- 1.Revlon duties: When a board decides to sell the company, it triggers Revlon duties to maximize shareholder value. The board must conduct a reasonable auction or market check.
- 2.Business judgment rule: Ordinarily, board decisions are protected if made in good faith, with due care, and without conflicts. However, the abbreviated review (90 minutes), failure to shop the deal, and the conflicted fairness opinion may overcome the presumption.
- 3.Due care: The 90-minute review and reliance on a potentially conflicted advisor raise questions about whether the directors were adequately informed (Smith v. Van Gorkom).
- 4.Remedies: If Revlon duties are breached, the court may enjoin the merger or award damages. Enhanced scrutiny applies rather than business judgment deference.
Essay Question 2
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
- 1.Insider trading (tipper-tippee liability): Under SEC Rule 10b-5, the CEO (tipper) breached her fiduciary duty by disclosing material nonpublic information for a personal benefit (benefit to a family member satisfies this). The brother (tippee) is liable if he knew or should have known the information came from an insider breach.
- 2.Material nonpublic information: FDA drug approval is clearly material (a reasonable investor would consider it important) and was nonpublic at the time of the tip.
- 3.Fiduciary duty breach: The CEO violated her duty of loyalty to the corporation and its shareholders by using confidential corporate information for personal/family benefit.
- 4.Penalties: Civil disgorgement of profits, SEC civil penalties up to three times the profit gained, and potential criminal prosecution.
MBE-Style Multiple Choice Questions
Select the best answer for each question. Click "Reveal Answer" to see the correct answer and explanation.
Question 1
A corporation's board of directors approved a transaction in which the corporation purchased property from a board member at above-market value. The board member disclosed the conflict and abstained from voting. The remaining directors approved the deal after minimal review. A shareholder challenges the transaction. The court will most likely:
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal
Correct Answer: B
Self-dealing transactions involving a director on both sides trigger entire fairness review, which requires the transaction to be fair in both process and price. While disclosure and abstention are important factors, they do not automatically shift the standard back to the business judgment rule. The above-market price suggests the transaction may not satisfy the fair-price prong of entire fairness.
Question 2
A minority shareholder wants to bring a derivative action on behalf of the corporation for waste. The shareholder did not make a demand on the board of directors before filing suit. The board moves to dismiss for failure to make a demand. In a jurisdiction following the universal demand requirement, the court should:
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal
Correct Answer: B
In jurisdictions following the universal demand requirement (adopted in the MBCA and many states), a shareholder must make a demand on the board in all cases before filing a derivative action. There is no 'demand futility' exception. The shareholder's failure to make demand requires dismissal. The shareholder may refile after making demand and having it refused.
Question 3
Shareholders holding 60% of a corporation's voting stock want to remove a director without cause before the director's term expires. The corporation's articles do not address removal. Under the Model Business Corporation Act, the shareholders:
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal
Correct Answer: B
Under the MBCA, shareholders may remove a director with or without cause by a majority vote of the shares entitled to vote at an election of directors. The 60% vote exceeds the majority threshold. Removal may occur at a meeting called for that purpose, not only at the annual meeting.
Generate Custom Corporate Law Exam Questions
Need more practice? Our AI exam generator creates unlimited, tailored practice questions for corporate law and other subjects.