Home/Practice Questions/Employment Law

Employment Law Practice Exam Questions

Practice exam questions covering at-will employment, discrimination, wage and hour laws, wrongful termination, and workplace safety.

2 Essay Questions
3 Multiple Choice Questions

Essay Questions

Practice these issue-spotting hypotheticals under timed conditions. Write your analysis first, then compare to the model answer outline.

Essay Question 1

25 minutes
An employee was fired after complaining to HR about her supervisor's repeated comments about her religious headscarf. The employer says the termination was due to poor performance, pointing to a performance review from six months earlier. However, the employee's most recent review, given one month before the complaint, was positive. The supervisor who made the comments was involved in the termination decision. Analyze the employee's potential claims under Title VII.
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
  1. 1.Religious discrimination (disparate treatment): The supervisor's comments about the headscarf are direct evidence of discriminatory animus. Under the McDonnell Douglas framework: (1) employee is in a protected class, (2) was qualified, (3) suffered an adverse action, (4) circumstances suggest discrimination.
  2. 2.Retaliation: Termination shortly after an internal complaint about discrimination is strong evidence of retaliation under Title VII Section 704(a). Temporal proximity between the complaint and termination supports a causal connection.
  3. 3.Pretext: The employer's reliance on a stale performance review while ignoring the recent positive review suggests the stated reason is pretextual. The supervisor's involvement in the termination decision further undermines the employer's explanation.
  4. 4.Remedies: Back pay, front pay, compensatory damages for emotional distress, punitive damages if the employer acted with malice or reckless indifference, and attorney's fees.

Essay Question 2

25 minutes
A company classified all of its delivery drivers as independent contractors. The drivers use company-branded vehicles, follow routes assigned by the company, wear company uniforms, and cannot work for competing delivery services. However, they set their own daily start times and are paid per delivery. Several drivers filed a complaint alleging they are entitled to minimum wage and overtime under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Analyze whether the drivers are employees or independent contractors.
Model Answer OutlineClick to reveal
  1. 1.Economic reality test (FLSA): Courts consider the totality of circumstances, including (1) degree of control, (2) the worker's opportunity for profit or loss, (3) the worker's investment in equipment, (4) permanence of the relationship, (5) the skill required, and (6) whether the work is integral to the employer's business.
  2. 2.Control factors favoring employee status: company-branded vehicles, assigned routes, required uniforms, non-compete restriction. These show significant control over the manner of work.
  3. 3.Factors favoring IC status: flexible start times, per-delivery pay. But these are relatively minor compared to the degree of overall control.
  4. 4.If classified as employees, the drivers are entitled to minimum wage and overtime. The company may face back pay liability, liquidated damages, and penalties.

MBE-Style Multiple Choice Questions

Select the best answer for each question. Click "Reveal Answer" to see the correct answer and explanation.

Question 1

An employee was passed over for a promotion in favor of a younger, less-qualified applicant. The employee, age 55, files a claim under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). To establish a prima facie case, the employee must show all of the following EXCEPT:

A.The employee is at least 40 years old.
B.The employee was qualified for the promotion.
C.The employee suffered an adverse employment action.
D.The position was filled by someone under 40.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: D

Under the ADEA, the plaintiff must show: (1) membership in the protected class (40+), (2) qualification for the position, (3) an adverse employment action, and (4) circumstances giving rise to an inference of discrimination. The replacement need not be under 40 -- even replacement by a significantly younger worker within the protected class can support an inference of age discrimination (O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.).

Question 2

An employer implemented a strength test requiring all warehouse applicants to lift 100 pounds. The test disqualified 80% of female applicants but only 20% of male applicants. The employer argues the test is job-related. This is an example of:

A.Disparate treatment discrimination.
B.Disparate impact discrimination.
C.A bona fide occupational qualification.
D.Reasonable accommodation.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: B

Disparate impact occurs when a facially neutral policy disproportionately affects a protected class. The strength test is neutral on its face but disproportionately excludes women. Under Griggs v. Duke Power, the employer must demonstrate that the test is job-related and consistent with business necessity. Even if job-related, the plaintiff may prevail by showing a less discriminatory alternative exists.

Question 3

An employee reported suspected OSHA violations to the Department of Labor. Two weeks later, the employee was terminated. The employer claims the termination was part of a planned reduction in force. The employee's best claim is:

A.Wrongful termination in violation of public policy.
B.Whistleblower retaliation under OSHA's anti-retaliation provision.
C.Breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
D.Constructive discharge.
Reveal AnswerClick to reveal

Correct Answer: B

OSHA Section 11(c) prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who report safety violations. The temporal proximity between the report and termination creates an inference of retaliation. While wrongful termination in violation of public policy is also possible, the specific statutory claim under OSHA's anti-retaliation provision is the strongest and most direct claim.

Generate Custom Employment Law Exam Questions

Need more practice? Our AI exam generator creates unlimited, tailored practice questions for employment law and other subjects.

More Practice Question Subjects