Legal Doctrines/Criminal Law

Self-Defense

Self-defense justifies the use of force when a person reasonably believes force is necessary to defend against an imminent unlawful attack, with deadly force permitted only against threats of death or serious bodily harm.

Self-defense is a justification defense that permits a person to use force to defend themselves against an imminent unlawful attack. The defense, if successful, results in complete acquittal because the defendant's conduct is deemed legally justified rather than merely excused. The requirements vary between jurisdictions and between the common law and the Model Penal Code, but the core elements are consistent.

The defendant must have a reasonable belief that force is necessary to defend against an imminent threat. Imminence requires that the threat is immediate and present — not a past harm or a future possibility. Reasonableness is typically judged from the perspective of a reasonable person in the defendant's situation, though jurisdictions differ on how much of the defendant's subjective characteristics (size, prior experiences, knowledge of the attacker) are incorporated into the reasonable person standard. People v. Goetz explored this question in the context of a subway shooting, examining how the defendant's prior experiences with crime influenced the reasonableness assessment.

The force used in self-defense must be proportional to the threat. Non-deadly force may be used to repel a non-deadly attack. Deadly force — force intended or likely to cause death or serious bodily harm — is justified only when the defender reasonably believes they face an imminent threat of death, serious bodily injury, kidnapping, or (in some jurisdictions) sexual assault. Using deadly force against a non-deadly threat is excessive and defeats the defense.

The initial aggressor generally cannot claim self-defense unless they withdraw from the encounter and communicate that withdrawal to the other party. The duty to retreat, where it exists, requires the defender to retreat if they can do so in complete safety before resorting to deadly force. The castle doctrine and stand your ground laws modify or eliminate this retreat requirement. Battered spouse cases, such as State v. Norman, raise difficult questions about imminence when the defendant kills a sleeping abuser after years of sustained domestic violence.

Key Elements

  1. 1A reasonable belief that force is necessary
  2. 2The threat must be imminent and unlawful
  3. 3The force used must be proportional to the threat
  4. 4Deadly force is justified only against threats of death or serious bodily harm
  5. 5The defender generally must not be the initial aggressor
  6. 6Duty to retreat applies in some jurisdictions (with castle doctrine exception)

Why Law Students Need to Know This

Self-defense is one of the most commonly tested criminal law topics. Students must analyze imminence, proportionality, the reasonable person standard, the duty to retreat, and special contexts like battered spouse syndrome.

Landmark Case

People v. Goetz

Read the full case brief →

Related Cases

Related Legal Terms

Master Every Doctrine with Briefly

Get unlimited access to AI case briefs, flashcards, outlines, and 500+ pre-written briefs for $5/month with a 7-day free trial.