372 U.S. 726 (1963)
Ferguson v. Skrupa is a landmark Supreme Court case that addressed the extent of state power to regulate economic activities, specifically focusing on the practice of debt adjustment.
Does a Kansas statute prohibiting non-lawyers from engaging in debt adjusting violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?
State regulation of economic activities is permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as long as there is a rational relation to a legitimate government interest.
The Supreme Court held that the Kansas statute was constitutional and did not violate the Due Process Clause.
This case is crucial for law students as it exemplifies judicial deference to state legislatures in economic matters. By affirming a state's power to regulate business practices without intense judicial scrutiny, Ferguson v. Skrupa demonstrates the broad discretion of states under the Fourteenth Amendment. It underscores the shift from an era where the Court frequently invalidated economic regulations, moving towards an era of legislative autonomy in matters of economic regulation.