Summary
Section 13 defines the tort of battery as an act by a defendant that causes a harmful contact with the person of another, if the act is done with the intention of bringing about a harmful or offensive contact, or an apprehension thereof. Battery protects the fundamental right to bodily integrity and freedom from unwanted physical interference.
The contact need not be directly with the plaintiff’s body—it extends to anything closely connected with the body, such as clothing, objects held, or a vehicle occupied by the plaintiff. The defendant need not intend harm; intent to cause offensive contact is sufficient, and the transferred intent doctrine may apply.
Battery does not require actual physical injury. The tort is complete upon the harmful or offensive contact, and a plaintiff may recover nominal damages even absent provable physical harm. This reflects the law’s interest in protecting personal autonomy and dignity, not merely physical well-being.
Key Elements
- 1An act by the defendant
- 2Intent to cause harmful or offensive contact (or apprehension thereof)
- 3Actual harmful contact with the plaintiff’s person
- 4Contact extends to anything closely connected with the body
- 5No requirement of actual physical injury
Practical Application
Battery claims arise in contexts ranging from physical assaults to unauthorized medical procedures, unwanted sexual contact, and even excessive force by law enforcement. Courts also apply battery principles to cases involving exposure to harmful substances when the defendant knew the contact would occur. The “offensive contact” standard is judged by whether a reasonable person would find the contact offensive.
Exam Relevance
Battery is typically the first intentional tort tested. Key issues to spot: Was there intent under § 8A? Did the contact extend to the plaintiff’s person or something closely connected? Was it harmful or merely offensive? Did consent exist as a defense? Remember that the eggshell plaintiff rule applies—the defendant takes the plaintiff as found.