Article VI — Witnesses
Rule 615: Excluding Witnesses
What is Excluding Witnesses?
Rule 615, often called 'the Rule' or 'invoking the Rule,' allows any party to request that witnesses be separated so they cannot hear each other's testimony. When invoked, the court must grant the request — it is mandatory, not discretionary. The purpose is to prevent witnesses from tailoring their testimony to match what others have said and to strengthen cross-examination by making it harder for witnesses to coordinate their accounts.
Source: Fed. R. Evid. 615
Rule Text
At a party's request, the court must order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear other witnesses' testimony. The court may also do so on its own. But this rule does not authorize excluding: a party who is a natural person; an officer or employee of a party that is not a natural person, after being designated as the party's representative by its attorney; a person whose presence a party shows to be essential to presenting the party's claim or defense; or a person authorized by statute to be present.
Plain English Explanation
Rule 615, often called 'the Rule' or 'invoking the Rule,' allows any party to request that witnesses be separated so they cannot hear each other's testimony. When invoked, the court must grant the request — it is mandatory, not discretionary. The purpose is to prevent witnesses from tailoring their testimony to match what others have said and to strengthen cross-examination by making it harder for witnesses to coordinate their accounts.
The rule has four mandatory exceptions: parties who are natural persons (individuals) cannot be excluded because they have a right to be present at their own trial or hearing; a designated representative of an organizational party (like a corporate officer designated to sit at counsel table) cannot be excluded; persons shown to be essential to a party's case (such as a case agent for the government or an expert who needs to hear other testimony to give their opinion) cannot be excluded; and persons authorized by statute to be present (such as victims under the Crime Victims' Rights Act) cannot be excluded.
Violation of a sequestration order does not automatically result in exclusion of the witness's testimony, but it can lead to sanctions including exclusion, contempt, or a jury instruction about the violation.
Key Points
- 1Sequestration of witnesses is mandatory upon request — the court must grant it
- 2Prevents witnesses from tailoring testimony to match what others have said
- 3Four exceptions: natural-person parties, designated organizational representatives, essential persons, and statutory authorizations
- 4Violation of the order does not automatically exclude testimony but can lead to sanctions
Common Exam Issues
- Identifying which witnesses fall within the exceptions to sequestration
- Whether a government case agent qualifies as a person 'essential' to the presentation of a party's case
- The appropriate remedy when a witness violates a sequestration order
Landmark Cases
- Geders v. United States
- United States v. Ell
Article VI — Witnesses
This rule is part of Article VI — Witnesses of the Federal Rules of Evidence.
Browse All FRE RulesMaster Evidence Law with AI-Powered Study Tools
20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.
Start Free Trial