FRCP/Trial

Rule 38: Right to a Jury Trial; Demand

Quick Answer

What is Right to a Jury Trial; Demand?

The Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases for suits at common law where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. Rule 38 provides the procedural mechanism for invoking that right in federal court.

Source: Fed. R. Civ. P. 38

Plain English Explanation

The Seventh Amendment preserves the right to a jury trial in civil cases for suits at common law where the value in controversy exceeds twenty dollars. Rule 38 provides the procedural mechanism for invoking that right in federal court.

To preserve your jury trial right, you must file a written demand no later than 14 days after the last pleading directed to the issue. This is a strict deadline — if you miss it, you waive your right to a jury trial. A jury demand can cover all issues or be limited to specific issues. If one party demands a jury trial, the other parties may rely on that demand and do not need to file their own.

Waiver of the jury right is a serious consequence and happens automatically if the demand is not timely served. However, the court has discretion to grant a late jury demand on motion. The determination of whether an issue is triable by jury depends on whether the claim is legal (jury right) or equitable (no jury right) — this is the historical test, which looks to whether the claim would have been tried at law or in equity in 18th-century England.

Key Points

  1. 1Jury trial demand must be served within 14 days after the last pleading on the issue
  2. 2Failure to make a timely demand waives the jury right
  3. 3The court may grant a late demand in its discretion
  4. 4The legal vs. equitable distinction determines whether a jury right exists
  5. 5One party's demand preserves the jury right for all parties on that issue

Common Exam Issues

  • Whether a particular claim is legal (jury right) or equitable (no jury right)
  • Waiver by failure to make a timely demand
  • The historical test for determining the right to a jury trial
  • Treatment of mixed legal and equitable claims — the Beacon Theatres priority of legal issues

Important Cases

Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U.S. 500 (1959)

Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469 (1962)

Curtis v. Loether, 415 U.S. 189 (1974)

Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. Terry, 494 U.S. 558 (1990)

Related Rules

Master Civil Procedure with AI-Powered Study Tools

20+ tools to help you study smarter. 3-day free trial, then $9.99/month.

Start Free Trial